Oh, I agree. I have nothing against AI ethics in principle.
But one thing is what AI ethics should be and another what AI ethicists (not all, just some of the most vocal among then) are doing - or better, how they're doing it.
Oh, I agree. I have nothing against AI ethics in principle.
But one thing is what AI ethics should be and another what AI ethicists (not all, just some of the most vocal among then) are doing - or better, how they're doing it.
Totally agree. I also think that "algorethics" is a distraction because ethics is not about algorithms or codes, but about humans who write codes/algorithms which affect themselves and others. AI ethics cannot be reduced to algorithms no less than ethics reduced to rules and laws. You cannot legislate or codify everything. AI ethics is not about compute or data either. Ethics is all about human decision-making and agency, in this case, in human-computer interaction.
Oh, I agree. I have nothing against AI ethics in principle.
But one thing is what AI ethics should be and another what AI ethicists (not all, just some of the most vocal among then) are doing - or better, how they're doing it.
Totally agree. I also think that "algorethics" is a distraction because ethics is not about algorithms or codes, but about humans who write codes/algorithms which affect themselves and others. AI ethics cannot be reduced to algorithms no less than ethics reduced to rules and laws. You cannot legislate or codify everything. AI ethics is not about compute or data either. Ethics is all about human decision-making and agency, in this case, in human-computer interaction.