Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jurgen Gravestein's avatar

I mean the expectations were beyond sky high. Imagine the headlines if Google had shipped a lesser than GPT-4 model.

Both the demo and the benchmark methodology suggest that what they really wanted was to make a big splash, even though in actuality it looks like they managed to built something that is on-par with current state-of-the-art.

Don’t get me wrong, that’s fucking awesome. I have no dog in this fight. But it does raise the question: was Google so far behind that it took them a year to catch up with OpenAI, or are large language models hitting a plateau?

Expand full comment
Mason's avatar

Agree with the points presented here. It was a self-own on Google's part to release that video.

The thing is, they do this frequently. A couple years back they had a demo of the Google Assistant that could make appointments on your behalf. You could tell it what you wanted and in the demo the assistant made a voice call to a real human, had a conversation, navigated your google calendar and made the appointment. All without any additional human interaction. I remember being stunned. But Google Assistant still cannot work this way.

Lame and unnecessary at best. Dishonest/duplicitous at worst.

Expand full comment
13 more comments...

No posts