Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Phil Tanny's avatar

Imagine that I built a car that can go 800mph. And I confidently predict that next year's model will achieve 1200mph. This may all sound quite impressive, until we realize that my "genius" invention ignores the fact that pretty much nobody can control a car at those speeds. That's what I see happening here, highly skilled technicians with a very limited understanding of the human condition, or even that much interest in it.

AI or SI has nowhere to get it's values but from us, and/or perhaps the larger world of nature. In either case, evolution rules the day, the strong dominate the weak, and survival of the fittest determines the outcome. If Altman's vision comes to pass, we humans will not be either the strongest or the fittest. Altman's vision might be compared to a tribe of chimps, who invent humans with the goal of using the humans to harvest more bananas. That story is unlikely to turn out the way the chimps had in mind.

Speaking of chimps, a compelling vision of the human condition can be found in the documentary Chimp Empire on Netflix. Perhaps the most credible way to predict the future is to study the past, and Chimp Empire gives us a four hour close up look at our very deep past. The relevance is that the similarity between our human behavior today and that of chimps is remarkable.

The point here is that the foundation of today's human behaviors was built millions of years before we were human. The fact that these ancient behaviors have survived to this day almost unchanged in any fundamental way reveals how deeply embedded they are in the human condition.

AI is not going to change any of these human behaviors, it will just amplify them. Some of that will be wonderful, and some of it horrific. When the horrific becomes large enough, it will erase the wonderful.

Expand full comment
Christian Röpke's avatar

In April I was in San Francisco and heard Sam Altman speaking. It was at that time that it dawned on me on how much he and the people in the same tech bubble appear to have lost touch with reality.

I couldn't find a better example of Heidegger's Gestell: Tech has become so pervasive, that they can't think out of technical solutions anymore. Every problem needs an AI solution.

But does it?

Great article, Alberto.

Expand full comment
29 more comments...

No posts